Observation of a peer’s teaching practice

I came to observe a class by Chuck for MA Performance: Screen on the 6th March. I provided written feedback in an ROT form and Chuck responded with their reflections.

Full ROT form here.


A summary of my feedback:

Engagement & Atmosphere:

  • Students attended despite being at a critical project stage, showing strong engagement.
  • Created a warm, non-hierarchical learning environment that encouraged creativity and participation.

Activities

  • Effectively demonstrated key principles (e.g., gesture with unexpected sound).
  • Group sound performance helped create an inclusive and reflective space.
    • Could clarify activity duration upfront to manage expectations.

      Slides & Accessibility:
    • Some slides could be redesigned for clarity (e.g., separating steps of paired activities).
    • Music Concrete slide might imply incorrect genre classification—could be split.
    • Full-size video playback would enhance engagement.
    • Harvard referencing on slides could model proper citation for students.

      Order of Information:
    • Could introduce ‘reduced listening’ concept before students read their practice work.
    • Presenting Cage before Schaeffer might better illustrate historical progression.

      References & Diversity:
    • Majority of references were white men—consider incorporating more diverse voices.
    • Suggested alternatives: Éliane Radigue, Trevor Mathison, Otolith Group, Salomé Voegelin, Lisbeth Lipari, and Pauline Oliveros.

      Audio Considerations:
    • A Bluetooth speaker could improve sound quality over in-built UAL systems.

      Overall:
    • A fantastic, inspiring session with strong student engagement and practical application to their projects.


Chuck then responded with their reflections, here is a summary:

Encouraging Feedback & Pedagogical Approach:

  • Validating to hear that my teaching style is well-received.
  • Encouraged by the recognition of my pastoral support for students.
  • Balancing emotional labor in supporting students is important for sustainability.
  • Diversity & Curriculum Development:
    • Extremely helpful feedback on diversifying references.
    • Committed to feminist and decolonial approaches in curriculum design.
    • Already incorporating suggested texts (e.g., replacing David Toop with Salomé Voegelin).
    • Adding Pauline Oliveros’ Deep Listening exercises and a clip from Handsworth Songs.
  • Practical Improvements:
    • Will start Harvard referencing slides to model best practice for students.
    • Acknowledging personal academic insecurities but using this as a growth opportunity.
    • Adjusting slide order for better chronological flow of ideas.
    • Ensuring full-size video playback for better student engagement.
  • Activity Structure & Accessibility:
    • Will provide clearer timings and instructions for activities.
    • Recognizing the importance of structured guidance, especially for neurodiverse students.
  • Overall Reflection:
    • This feedback has been invaluable for my development.
    • Excited to continue learning and collaborating throughout the course.
    • Grateful for the exchange of ideas and looking forward to more discussions!

This entry was posted in Review of teaching practice, Uncategorised. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *